All posts by Shawn West

I've been tagging along hunting with my family and friends since I was eight years old. Over twenty years later I still hunt waterfowl, wild turkeys, deer, and small game whenever I get a chance. "Get Out & Go Hunting" combines my two passions, hunting and writing about hunting. Hope you enjoy it, and if you like what you read, please subscribe to have posts delivered to you via e-mail or feed reader.

On Being Silent and Still

A multitude of poor decisions in my university years have blurred my childhood memories a bit, so it may not have been my first waterfowl hunt, but it was the earliest that I can remember with crystal clarity. I might have been eight or ten years old back then but in my mind the old imprints are palpably rooted in the present.

I had heard Dad’s footsteps on the creaky farmhouse floor moments before I felt his hand gently shaking my shoulder. A goose hunt had been on offer the night before, and to be honest I had spent a restless night hoping the weather would be cooperative and I’d get to hit the field with Dad.

“You getting up to hunt?” he said in a half-whispered voice.

I said I was and he left the room, but not before quietly advising me “Dress warm.”

In the beam of small handheld flashlight that he had left me, I scrounged together long underwear, heavy socks, jogging pants, and two sweaters before descending the steep stairs down to the kitchen. The woodstove fire had been going all night and the stovetop closed with a groan as Dad fed it another stick. The light smell of burning wood perfumed the downstairs and I was pleased to find that Dad had prepared a couple of pieces of toast for me.  A stiff breeze hummed low outside and when I checked the thermometer, the mercury was hovering near single digits.

Dad handed me a plaid-red flannel work coat and then an olive grey overcoat that was probably two sizes too big.  We dug in an old covered plastic tub in the back room and found some brown mitts and a dark green toque and while Dad put some shotgun shells in his pocket and zipped an old leather case around his Remington 1100, I slipped into a pair of red-soled rubber boots.  Dad inspected my attire and untucked my pants from my boot tops.  He folded them down over the outside of the boots and muttered something about how that would keep anything from slipping down in through the top them.  We turned off the lights and stepped out into the wind.

Our hunting ground that morning was a farm field belonging to a friend of Dad’s and there had been a smattering of geese in it recently.  This was in the years before Canada geese were an overabundant pestilence to farmers, and to our knowledge at the time no one specialized in goose hunting.  We arrived in the morning dim and walked down to a rock pile that was in the middle of the field; I don’t know how old the stone pile was, but there was long grass growing in a ring around it and some greying cedar rails from some old, disused fence had been thrown up against the rocks.

Dad had carried six Canada goose decoys in an old CO-OP feed bag and before he put them out, he dug in his pocket and passed me a black garbage bag.

“Take this to sit on and find a spot on the rock pile where you’re covered up a bit.”  Doing as I was told I snuck in behind an angled fencepost and in between a couple of rocks that provided, at least initially a bit of support.  Placing the decoys (which are by today’s standards laughably primitive looking, but to my young eye on that dingy, windy morning were uber-realistic) he loaded his shotgun and sat a few feet from me against the rocks, behind some tall fronds of grass. The wind blew consistently, and sometimes gusts would lay the grass in front of us nearly flat, but not wanting to complain I turned up the big collar and lapels on that olive jacket and buried my face deeper down against my chest.  I seem to remember some idle chit-chat about where the geese would come from, and if he thought they would land right in the decoys, and other child-like curiosities.  In the middle of one of my interminable questions, Dad hissed “Okay, there’s geese right there…” and I knew that was my signal to be silent and still. Seeing geese in those days in that part of the province was a much rarer occurrence than it is now and I was hyper-vigilant about not being the reason these birds spooked.  While I sat perfectly still, Dad drew a chocolate brown goose call out of his pocket and blew a few short greeting honks before sliding it back into his coat and crouching down further.

At first, I couldn’t see the birds from under the brim of my hat, but before long I could hear their moans and clucks, and their calls guided my eyes to the three low black silhouettes moving against the close, slate-coloured sky and they were winging our way, hard into the wind.   They were no more than thirty feet off the ground when they reached the decoys, but they had no real intention of committing to land with our fakes when Dad rose to shoot.

That was my signal to raise my eyes as well, and for a split second the geese hung in the air as a perfect slow-motion tableau of thin, black, elegant necks, glowing flashes of white throats, and the whir of wings spinning dust-coloured underbellies away from a danger that they were oblivious to just seconds before.  That almost surreal stillness was broken when the bark of the gun split the air and a goose spun down from the sky.  On the second report nothing fell, before Dad turned at the hip slightly and crumpled another bird with the third volley as it tailed away from him.  The one remaining goose turned hard and wide, before speeding away with the driving winds then at its tail.  My heart hammered in my ears and I was so excited that I had no words; only my Dad might know what my face looked like at that precise moment but I can almost sense that it was probably one of wide-eyed excitement and probably some goofy child-like grin.

I do remember that Dad was smiling at me in the way he does when he’s pleased with himself.

He nodded to the nearest bird laying belly-up in the field and with a smile said “Go get that one”.  Extricating myself from my hiding spot, I strode out into the wind for my first retrieve.

That was another ‘imprint’ moment.  I’d never been so intimately present on the hunt, never picked up a still warm goose, and I clumsily brought it back to the rock pile and laid it next to ‘my spot’. It was as perfect a bird as my mind could have imagined. To this day I don’t remember where Dad hit it, but it was completely clean without a single bloodstained feather.  It was as though Dad had missed it completely and it had simply died of fright. I remember the weight of it in my hand and the warmth of it as it laid on a rock next to my right leg.  I remember that while the body was warm, especially when I put my hand under the breast feathers, the black feet were ice cold and scaly. For another hour or so we sat there and a slight spittle of rain started.  Dad said we were leaving and I was hooked on the experience enough to want to stay but just cold enough to be okay to head to the vehicle.

It was my self-appointed job to mule out the two geese while Dad carried the bag of decoys and his shotgun.  I huffed and puffed valiantly to keep up to him while carrying my awkward load before he finally turned to me and set his gun and decoys down.

“Here,” he said “carry them like this,” and he hoisted the birds over my shoulder.  I’d been dragging their heads on the ground and kicking their necks long enough, he said smiling.  Like the kid I was, I asked him why it mattered to dead geese, and in a matter of fact and slightly abrupt way, he said something about his hunting ethic that has become a permanent part of my own.

“Because it’s disrespectful to the geese to drag their heads along through the mud and dirt and cow shit.” End of sentence.

Dead animals still had dignity: that was the message.  They don’t die so you can mistreat them before you process them: that was the message. Show respect, because you took their life for sport, or for food, or both: that was the message.  Messages I still try to live by today every time I shoot a duck, a goose, a turkey, or in rare instances, a deer.  He said it with what, to my young mind, equated to a heroic conviction and the rest of the way the geese swung behind my back while I carried on with aching triceps, sore hands, and a commitment that not one feather would touch the ground until we got to the car.

We went for a special breakfast that morning at a place that isn’t there anymore and I remember a couple of old-timers and one or two people that Dad knew from his youth asking how we made out and asking me jokingly if I got any birds.

It all made me feel quite grown up and responsible.

We went back to the farm and while Dad plucked and cleaned the geese, I showed off, embellished the story, and generally acted like an excited kid, because I was one then.  Two years ago, I took my (then five year old) son out for his first goose hunt.  Maybe it made as much of an impression on him as this one I just related did on me, and maybe it didn’t, but that’s okay.

Whatever it was for him, for me it was in so many ways indicative of the progression of Ontario’s waterfowling in the last twenty-five years or so.  Big, very realistic decoys numbering in the dozens and dozens.  A cacophony of hunters using equally realistic goose calls made from space-age and synthetic materials.  Head-to-toe camouflage.  Big flocks and big action.  It is now really (and with limited hyperbole) a bit of a new golden age for goose hunting.  So much so that, for some hunters I think, this ample abundance sometimes breeds contempt for Canada goose hunting.

I tried to explain this paradigm shift to my son, but he couldn’t picture just six decoys, just three birds all morning, just a couple of confident notes on an old wooden goose call to birds that wouldn’t decoy and were shot on the pass.  But then I told him about the things that stayed the same, and maybe just maybe he got it.  His restless night before the hunt, a quiet breakfast with his Dad while everyone else in the big old farmhouse slept, bundling up for the weather, being respectful to the geese, and most importantly being silent and still.  Just like always we went for a special breakfast, and just like always while we went to clean the birds he regaled his mother and his brother with his version of the stories from the hunt, because he was just a little, excited kid.

And that’s the other thing that doesn’t change, because sometimes, when it comes to goose hunting, I’m just an excited kid too.

Legends of the (Very Nearly) Fall

It was on the last Friday in September 2006 that I rolled into the camp for the first time.  I had heard the legends and was flush with anticipation.  Anticipation of a party that night, and anticipation of the opening of duck and goose season the next morning.

I had heard about how rowdy it could get, and I was a dumb kid of 26 just looking for some fun.  For weeks in advance of that night I had been getting emails confirming my presence, asking if I was going to need a bunk, and generally hyping up my expectations for the craziness that was near-guaranteed to ensue.

I was not to be disappointed.  Upon arrival I was tossed a commemorative hat.

I thought “Hmmmm.  They have hats. Can never have too many hats I guess.”

Then I was thrown a beer.

I thought “Hmmmm. They have beer. Can never have too many beers I guess.”

Then we proceeded to get silly in a way that a bunch of guys in their mid-20’s when left alone with each other typically do.  We told dirty jokes and traded verbal jabs at each other.  We feasted on chips and wild-game pepperoni sticks.  We laughed with a hysteria and abandon I hadn’t felt before.  We drank beer, then some whiskey, then some more beer.  We blew our best goose and duck calling contest routines at volumes that probably could have been heard a concession over. Someone took a deer mount off the wall and tried to poke someone else with it.  We told grossly overblown lies that passed for hunting stories.  We became instant friends.  We stayed up way too late, and we slept way too little before the alarm clocks blared out their warning that we were going to have to get up and set up the decoys.

So, laden-down with gear and decoys, we marched through corn stubble and proceeded to hunt geese and ducks.  Some heads were heavy, some stomachs were wobbly, there was as much sleeping in the ditch as there was shooting, and the pictures about summed up our success.

Was it sensible? No.

Was it safe? To be frank, that thought wasn’t really front of mind because we were too young to be anything other than impervious to criticism and invincible in the face of poor decision-making.  I’m not an apologist for how we acted; it was just something that happened and everyone turned out okay.

Was it fun?  You’re goddamn right it was.

Every year for a decade, the same core of men (and once or twice, a woman) has invariably joined together for this ritual. I missed a year after one of my sons was born, other guys have missed a year here and there for family or work commitments, and there have been a couple of new recruits over the years, but the nucleus of hunters has remained the same.  We’ve hunted in rain and wind, we’ve hunted on bluebird days when nothing flew.  We’ve hunted on days so hot our faces got sunburnt and we nearly melted packing gear in and out.  We’ve sat ditches, hidden inside rows of standing corn, crouched in ill-concealed marsh boats, gone over our boots and waders on occasion, snuck through mazes of hay bales to jump birds, and flopped down layout blinds in windrows of straw. I’ve been sprayed by the shaking of a wet dog, and I’ve seen long shots and even longer retrieves executed with consistent success.  I tried my hand at flocking the heads on my own decoys, and one of our more entrepreneurial friends built his own ‘motion decoy’ from an old shell decoy, some spray-painted ovals of corrugated plastic, and a chain saw crank operated from a distance by a pull cord of baler twine.

It was a deadly decoy that day, by the way.

We’ve eaten like kings on bacon and goose roll-ups, slow-cooker pulled goose sandwiches, heaps of coleslaw, jalapeno & cream cheese stuffed goose nuggets wrapped in bacon, pan seared duck breasts, and all sorts of sketchy, dirty snack food.  Post-hunt breakfasts are well-known in the little town we frequent and as a group we’ve filled entire local restaurants, recapping stories from hunts that happened short hours previously, guzzling coffee, and tipping the wait staff generously.

On top of all that, we somehow find time to get the birds to put feet and flaps down and shoot a mess of geese and a slew of ducks.

Writing this just now, I’ve noticed that I’m grinning uncontrollably, and I hope that any friends I have reading this are doing the same.  If we aren’t friends yet, and you’re reading this, I hope this echoes what you and all the other waterfowlers out there are about to embark upon as the early season descends on us, and I hope you’re smiling too.

This is a time of year that means a lot to me. Summer is over. Mornings will get cooler and I’ll be able to see my breath again.  We’ll wave our flags and run the calls and the birds will turn wide into the wind before they glide down into the hole in our decoys.  Someone will yell “Take ‘em!” and we’ll peel a few down.  Later we’ll make a pile and take our photos and it will all seem to have gone by too quickly.  The end of that opening weekend hunt is bittersweet, but we’re not there yet, not by a long shot.

Enjoy it friends, because the most wonderful time of the year is upon us.

Why I Shoot a Pump Shotgun (and Why You Should Too)

I was sitting in my car the other day, doing that daily ritual that is my morning commute when all I could really think about was goose hunting.  The birds are finished moulting and there is a soothing regularity to seeing them fly through the countryside of south-Central Ontario.  Every morning I am treated to the spectacle of big flocks dropping into the recently-harvested grain fields that line the county roads and highways that lead me to my ‘real job’.

And every morning, I just sit there in the car trying to remain focused on the road.  But, like any hunter that can relate to my sickness, I’m mentally transported to the goose blind, where I’m crouched motionless, thumb on the safety of my 870, waiting for the birds to put their feet and flaps down.

My 870.  The first and, to date, only shotgun I’ve ever owned.

My relationship with it is longer than my relationship with my wife, my children, and several dozen of people that I call ‘friends’.  It is older than this forum where I pour out my drivel by more than fifteen years.  It has been with me for almost all of the most treasured moments in my hunting career.  My first duck, my first goose, my first Eastern turkey, and the only Merriam’s I’ve hunted.  On chilly December afternoons, grouse and rabbits have found their way into the stew pot via the muzzle of that old gun. I’ve thrown a slug barrel on it and punched paper, but have not had call to fire it at a whitetail…yet.

It came to me at Christmas in 1993, almost a full year before I could legally hunt with it, and I remember the long box with a bow sitting next to my stocking that December morning, and I can feel to this day the trembling excitement that my hands had when I unboxed it.  It was “my first gun” and in truth my first real hunting possession of any kind.  But it is not just familiarity and tradition that make me pull that scattergun out of the cabinet every year, although those are part of the appeal.  It is also just a reliable, bomb-proof, smooth-cycling gun that does everything that I’ve ever asked it to do.

It has been dropped…hard.  It has been disassembled and reassembled in the front seat of a truck. It has been soaked so thoroughly that water ran in a stream out of the barrel.  I once forgot about it in a damp gun sock for three days; it wiped down clean and it shot flawlessly the very next day. Target loads, small-game shells, duck loads and big goose pellets have all flown down the barrel and it has thrown empty hulls every time. I have jammed various choke tubes down the muzzle, both in a sanitary setting and in the field, with no incident.  I have been soft to it and I’ve been rough with it and it never once complained.

In 2013, on the last hunt of the goose season, I ejected my final unspent shells of the fall from it and the action would not close.  The ejector pin had snapped after countless thousands of shells had been cycled through it, and part of me felt the twinge of panic that a parent feels when their child gets sick. I took the old girl the local gun shop and for a pittance they had it back in my hands promptly.  A few short months later, it barked early one spring morning in the mountains near Cranbrook, British Columbia and flopped the bird that completed my Canadian Wild Turkey Slam.

Reliability aside, there is also a visceral, Zen-like pleasure in the fluid back-and-forth of the pump action.  A calming, balanced rhythm that has become the metronome to my waterfowling and skeet shooting.

Now I have fired other guns.  I own and/or have fired the gamut of other weapons that autoload, or bolt.  I have long coveted my father’s break-action Ruger Red Label Over-Under 20 gauge, and to shoulder and fire that shiny toy is an act of pure euphoria. The ‘throw’ of a lever action on my cousin’s 30-30 was fun and is very nearly as calming as the slide action.  I own a pump-action rifle as well, a classic Remington Model 14, and it is so smooth that the recoil from one fired .30 Remington round completes two-thirds of the cycling for me.  But when I think about shooting my mind always comes back to the cadenced, metallic “chick-chick” of the 870 moving empties out the breech.

I could give you technical reasons why the pump gun is a wise choice.  The in-line motion of the action helping to maintain a level sight-plane for second and third shots. Improved safety over the risk of inadvertently firing a second shot with an autoloader. The precision to fire planned shots rather than simply putting up a rapid-fire ‘wall-of-lead-or-steel’ but these are mostly anecdotal and in years of looking for it, I’ve never found a definitive technical reason that would give a pump shotgun the edge other than reliability and ease of use.

And for some people, those two reasons are reason enough.

For me though it is something less tangible, and if we were going to break me down psychologically then I’m certain the comfort, tradition, ease of use, reliability, versatility, and control of the pump shotgun would trump all the new-wave, fancy, high-technology, ultra-magnum, occasionally high-maintenance autoloaders out there.  Do not take it personally and just shoot whatever it is you like to shoot.

I will just occupy my corner of the blind and saw away at the slide action as the ducks and geese lock onto the decoys and begin to float in, sometimes knocking down a bird here and there and grinning like a dummy.

Courting Controversy & Marrying Compromise

This week, police officers in the City of Toronto shot a sick coyote.  There was a hue and cry about it from many areas and these vociferous arguments appealed to the basest instincts in the animal versus humanity dichotomy: anthropomorphism, concepts of value relative to human versus animal life, and some abstract concept of kinship with wildlife.

A June photo of the coyote in question. Photo lifted from www.cp24.com
A June photo of the coyote in question. Photo lifted from www.cp24.com

Most of it was bunk.

You see, per the media narrative, this coyote was a ‘single father’ raising three pups after his companion female coyote met her demise under the wheels of a car. This coyote’s death put the orphaned pups in danger (presumably more danger than they already were in as simply being urban coyotes), and the Toronto Wildlife Centre came to the fore in their objections to this course of action, making arguments that stray domestic animals were more harmful than this solitary coyote, that a coyote had only once been documented to ‘nip’ a person in Toronto, and that they themselves could have undertaken the humane treatment and rehabilitation of this heroic animal (although there was no indication, at least in the media, that they had actually attempted said treatment program, even though they admitted that they had been to the den of this coyote).

The theme is all too common.  The abstract and presumed well-being of wildlife being secondary to some ‘what-if’ scenario involving injury, inconvenience, or danger to a human population.  The coyote just wants to ‘live’ while humanity is the intruder in the animal’s domain.  Who is the real animal in this equation?

Et cetera, et cetera.

To put a finer point on this, let’s just do a thought experiment.  Imagine if you will, a member of the Toronto Wildlife Centre, or any other member of the public for that matter, attending the pup-laden den of said coyote w3ith nothing but good, helpful intentions.  Then the father coyote shows up.  Would there be hand-wringing and debate on the part of the coyote about the appropriate course of action, or debates about the merits of the intentions of the human, or would there be a reaction to defend the den and his offspring?  I can say with at least some degree of certainty (having been in reasonably close quarters with coyotes) that they can be vicious and dangerous when faced with survival situations, and while they are supremely adapted and bafflingly clever, they are still wildlife with instincts prone to defense of territory, defense of offspring, and defense of food.  It is presumable that the intruder in the den might face a sobering situation, and concepts of humane treatment or the abstract details of the human’s life likely would not enter the coyote’s frame of reference.

Who’s being anthropomorphic now?

Of course, that we can have debates about humane practice at all truly crystallizes the fundamental difference between the animal and human experience.  Observations of coyotes has shown me that they can do some basic planning, they can do some basic problem solving, and their will to live and ability to adapt is second to very few other native animals in Ontario.  But they are not rational, they are not erudite, they do not do math, and they are single-minded in one thing: survival.

And on the topic of survival, it is very likely plausible that an animal in such wretched shape could only have survived that long in an urban environment with access to human-generated food sources; severe mange of the kind seen on the coyote in question is a near-certain death sentence to truly wild coyote.  Again, the coyote apologists would use the stock answer of that being at least a ‘natural death’ with seemingly little concern for the suffering endured by the animal.  Also, and I’ve always stated this with conviction, a slow, potentially agonizing death, is still a death.  That it is caused ‘naturally’ by the chill of a vicious January night on a mangy coyote’s body or ‘unnaturally’ by the bullet from an urban police officer really has little bearing on the final outcome.

So here I am, walking that dangerous and controversial line between the rationalist viewpoint that in terms of safety and what could nebulously be termed ‘the greater good’ having a mange-riddled coyote that is attempting to support pups wandering and hunting through urban and suburban Scarborough is probably a bad idea.  At the end of the day I can understand, if not outwardly support the actions of the officers in this scenario.  A more impulsively misanthropic sentiment in me does somewhat lament that the situation has come to this, and I can certainly sympathize with the predicament the coyote (and less outwardly relatable wildlife like skunks, raccoons, squirrels, and possums) found itself in.  As someone raised with a lifelong conservation ethic, I never want to see the waste of wildlife.

But this is also time to consider the behaviour of people, and what the hue and cry (not to mention the legal and social ramifications) that would appear if said coyote had injured a person, or done worse than injure a person.  Would an angry populace be so ‘humane’ had it been a more violent scenario, such as the one from Cape Breton in 2009?

Of course there are stock responses for that argument as well from apologists.  That was an isolated incident.  That was the fault of people for not giving wildlife respect/a wide berth. That was a rogue animal.  People (whatever that means) deserve aggression or should expect animals to ‘fight back’…as though animals know there is even a fight happening, as opposed to just acting on instinctual behaviours.

Et cetera, et cetera.

Of course the fundamental issue with these arguments is that, like it or not, at the most base and primal level, human life is more valuable than animal life.  It is a fairly recent, and probably impermanent paradigm, and most certainly not to be taken on a case by case basis (because there are several thousand people that I find less enjoyable than I find a wild turkey or a white-tailed deer) but on the overall balance.  We often hear that when it comes to drug use, car accidents, preventable diseases, and the like that ‘one person’s death is one too many’, and without a hint of apology I stand by this ethic when it comes to wildlife encounters at large.  Essentially I adhere to the following principal: If an animal can kill you back, and you are not being reckless or unnecessarily provoking to the animal, then I’m okay with people taking reasonable steps to end the animal before it has the opportunity to end you.  This is not radical thinking.  It is pragmatic and realistic. I personally am not some callous, gun-toting hillbilly that shoots every animal he sees on sight, but even if I were, that would not be germane to the greater argument surrounding this specific scenario in Scarborough, because the argument is about whether the coyote should live at the potential future risk to the people in that area at large.

I have seen many coyotes from afar that were simply doing ‘coyote things’ like hunting, travelling between territories, and generally doing a good job surviving.  I had no desire to shoot those specimens.  If I saw one in my backyard, acting erratically, sniffing around my door, or looking either sick and/or aggressive, then that’s a different set of circumstances and I would want to be granted (as I would grant any individual or agent of the state, like say, police officers) the liberty to handle the situation in a proactive manner.

Because it is not just hunters, conservationists, and animal rights activists that get a say here.  It is people at large and how they view interaction with all levels of wildlife that are required to make their own ethical decisions; decisions which often compromise some level of their personal ethical integrity.

Because even though the situation in Scarborough ended with the black and white choices of life or death for that coyote, the grey areas in urban wildlife management policy, the inevitable reliance on the almighty dollar, humanity’s occasionally misrepresented beliefs about animal behaviour, and our modern view of human-wildlife interactions informed the preamble to that final, some might say inevitable, outcome.